You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘wwiii’ tag.

The idea that the deep state opposes Herr Drumpf is one of the most absurd propositions that I’ve encountered since I’ve been following politics. It shows you how little political acumen that so many of our “heroes” in the “conspiracy”/deep political scene actually have…

In the foreign policy realm three of his first actions were to make sure that there’s no daylight between the United States and both Israel and Saudi Arabia (which was not true under Obama)! He also seems to be bound and determined to bring relations between United States and Iran back to the status quo ante the Iran Deal (even if he can’t end the agreement signed under Obama, more campaign lies)!

Drumpf’s going around bobbing and weaving essentially with his scattershot/kaleidoscopic foreign policy (one day friends with a nation like China one day irking them/making demands upon them) it almost seems like he’s running around like a chicken with its head chopped off insistent upon inciting WWIII!

Drumpf is planning a no-fly zone in Syria!

This was why Shillary was ostensibly no option at all, she would start WWIII! I must say my candidate Jill Stein also put this out there. I’d didn’t really agree with her, poking the Russian bear seemed to me to be something that the Obama admin enjoyed doing once the reset collapsed… I expected a Clinton II admin would poke the bear also, hopefully keeping in mind Mutually Assured Destruction is the reality if two or more great powers ever again go to war on this Earth! As Albert Einstein said (to paraphrase) he knew not what weapons WWIII would fought with (I assume that he assumed nuclear however), but WWIV would be fought with sticks and stones! (The MIC needs a great power as an enemy to justify all kinds of large-scale weaponry that aren’t needed against terrorists — who are sort of like small bands akin to guerrillas really.)

The neocons during the Dim Son Bush Reign of Error seemed to be at least feigning they no longer believed in Mutually Assured Destruction, but that was kind of an earlier version of alternative facts, I’d say. I’m not sure how you get around the reality of it… With an unhinged ersatz president — and additionally I think that this admin has a real neo-Nixonian tinge to it, and so I’d say that we are not only looking at another “Mutually Assured Destruction” denying White House resident, but a mad bomber to boot also! And of course Mutually Assured Destruction is not the only thing that this neofascist usurping clique are denying — among a multitude of other realities, that “the Orange One” (and his cretinous sycophantic minions) are planting their heads firmly in sand and unequivocally denying too!

Archives